Polls Archive

• A great year! MBB wins title; future Pac-12 revenue assures CU's opportunity to compete (52%, 120 Votes)
• Satisfied, but impatient for improvement (CU should have bolted to Pac-12 back in '94 when the Buffs were great!) (42%, 97 Votes)
• I miss the Big 8/12 and its rivalries. Playing Utah to end the season doesn't cut it (6%, 14 Votes)

Start Date: June 29, 2012 @ 4:09 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• I like it. CU needs exposure. CU can't build a program by beating Grambling State, and the $1.45 million is a bonus (42%, 89 Votes)
• Okay if it fits into future Pac-12/Big Ten contract (i.e., CU gets a home game v. Big Ten team in 2017) (30%, 64 Votes)
• Unacceptable. CU should only be playing home-and-home with other BCS schools. (28%, 61 Votes)

Start Date: June 28, 2012 @ 10:12 am
End Date: No Expiry

• It's better than the present system, but let's wait for all the details to come out before celebrating. (42%, 75 Votes)
• It's about time! While not a true playoff (1-AA has 20 teams), it's a great start! (30%, 53 Votes)
• Not excited. SEC got all it wanted (two potential teams), while "Cinderellas" that much less likely to get in. (28%, 51 Votes)

Start Date: June 26, 2012 @ 5:06 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• I don't mind it. Objectively, it's hard to rate CU higher based on recent history. (67%, 176 Votes)
• Actually, I'm kind of excited about it. Just adds to the list of those who will have to eat crow come fall. (24%, 63 Votes)
• It bothers me. No matter what - even when CU is good - the Buffs get no respect. (9%, 25 Votes)

Start Date: June 25, 2012 @ 7:49 am
End Date: No Expiry

• I like it. If teams like CU are undefeated, they'll be seeded. Can't ask for more than that. (45%, 107 Votes)
• I'm excited about it. It took 143 years, but college football finally has a playoff! (30%, 72 Votes)
• I don't like it. Plus-one/8 or 16 teams/status quo would have been better. (25%, 61 Votes)

Start Date: June 21, 2012 @ 7:01 pm
End Date: No Expiry