Polls Archive

• Too early to tell. It may not have been working with Bohn, but there is no guarantee of improvement with the next hire (54%, 147 Votes)
• Good news. Bohn was polarizing and ineffective. Better now than later (27%, 72 Votes)
• Bad news. CU looks bad - again. Bohn a scapegoat for issues beyond his control (19%, 52 Votes)

Start Date: May 29, 2013 @ 9:57 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Facts are facts. Seven straight losing seasons and stalled fundraising will be his legacy (45%, 132 Votes)
• Football results notwithstanding, he was a good AD. Basketball hires and move to Pac-12 a fine legacy (34%, 100 Votes)
• CU again makes news for the wrong reasons. I'm already ready to move on and find the next hire (21%, 60 Votes)

Start Date: May 28, 2013 @ 2:02 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Most of it rings true. I hate to see CU be disparaged, but if it helps bring about change, then I can't argue with the message (48%, 73 Votes)
• Ringo is only pointing out what is fact: There is a distinct lack of commitment from CU to athletics (30%, 46 Votes)
• A hack job from a CU hater. Nothing new to see here. (22%, 33 Votes)

Start Date: May 27, 2013 @ 3:39 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Great move. More exposure ... and there will certainly be no RPI issues next March (74%, 139 Votes)
• Don't mind picking up tough opponents, but do the (almost) all have to be from the Big 12? (16%, 30 Votes)
• Not so great a move. Kansas, Oklahoma State, Harvard ... and now Baylor? It's going to be hard to get to 20 wins next year with this young team (10%, 18 Votes)

Start Date: May 25, 2013 @ 9:37 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Looks good. A three-star with great potential ... and he's a local kid! (71%, 140 Votes)
• Not bad for a first commit, but it will be at least two years before Miller (250-pounds) will see the field (18%, 35 Votes)
• I'm just glad to see CU is competing with other BCS schools for players (11%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: May 24, 2013 @ 9:51 pm
End Date: No Expiry