Polls Archive

• Please. I bleed black and gold, but 3-4 wins is the best hope (52%, 106 Votes)
• If the players buy in, the schedule does lend itself to a bowl shot if the Buffs start fast (37%, 75 Votes)
• I'm onboard. Buffs undefeated until proven otherwise! Bowl-bound! (11%, 22 Votes)

Start Date: June 14, 2013 @ 3:06 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• 1st-4th - Picturesque setting + Ralphie = One of the stadiums best in the nation (81%, 184 Votes)
• 5th-8th - Folsom is great, but there are some other great and historic venues in the Pac-12 (13%, 30 Votes)
• 9th-12th - Smallish in size; well behind in amenities. Upgrades required! (6%, 13 Votes)

Start Date: June 13, 2013 @ 1:41 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Looks like a good pickup. Tall enough, excellent speed. What's not to like? (39%, 96 Votes)
• I'm just glad CU is able to recruit anyone at this point who has other BCS offers (37%, 93 Votes)
• Two stars from Rivals; unrated by Scout. Sorry, but it's going to be tough to compete with a roster of two star players (24%, 60 Votes)

Start Date: June 12, 2013 @ 11:11 am
End Date: No Expiry

• A - Despite recent woes, it's still the best move made by CU in decades (57%, 119 Votes)
• B - Glad for the move, but the transition hasn't exactly been smooth (38%, 79 Votes)
• C - Buffs would have made as much money (and been as lousy on the field) in the reconfigured Big 12 (4%, 8 Votes)
• F - Nothing has gone right since the move was made (1%, 3 Votes)

Start Date: June 11, 2013 @ 2:55 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• No. No. No. Some ideas are wroing, and they are always going to be wrong (80%, 167 Votes)
• Not excited about it, but if that the trend, CU should join in (16%, 34 Votes)
• The Buffs should join suit. CU is behind the curve on many innovations; they should get ahead of the curve on this one (4%, 7 Votes)

Start Date: June 10, 2013 @ 12:59 pm
End Date: No Expiry