There have been 4 comments, comment now

a–

September Grades – Defense and Special Teams

Colorado entered the first bye week of the 2024 season at 4-1, with a 2-0 conference record in the Buffs’ first season in the Big 12 since 2010. In a September to remember, the Buffs opened with a top FCS team, went on the road to face their two biggest rivals, came home for a “White Out” overtime win none of us will be forgetting anytime soon, and played their best overall game in memory in their first-ever game against Central Florida.

The 4-1 record is at least a slight surprise to many of us (in my preseason picks, I had CU at 3-2 in September. The first four games I picked correctly; happy to be wrong about the UCF road game). The 4-1 record raises questions as to what the new ceiling for Colorado may be this fall. Was the big win over Central Florida the new floor for the program? Or a once-in-a-season effort? Is a bowl bid now a certainty? … Or is there a chance for a second half collapse the Buff Nation endured in Coach Prime’s first season?

Time will tell. But, before we move on to October and a “Gold Rush” game against a ranked Kansas State team, let’s take a bye week look back at the first month of the 2024 campaign …

Colorado Defense – September, 2024 … 

Defensive Line

It may be hard to say some of the names along CU’s defensive line, but their impact is making their names easier and easier to remember.

Chidozie Nwankwo is a 5-11, 290-pound Nwankwo is a space eater. He’s been credited with just five tackles but he has one sack and a tackle for loss, but, more importantly, he occupies a couple of offensive linemen on every snap.

That opens up the tackling lanes for linebackers LaVonta Bentley and Nakhai Hill-Green to make plays. Nwankwo gives the Buffs a much-needed rock in the middle of the run defense, and is helping make stars of other defensive linemen.

Edge rushers Samuel Okulnloa, BJ Green, and Dayon Hayes, together with Shane Cokes and Taje McCoy, are making CU’s defense better.

Okunlola has 3.5 tackles for loss. Hayes also has 3.5 tackles for loss with two sacks, while Green had four tackles for loss. Overall, Colorado finished September with 38 tackles for loss, 17th in the nation.

Cokes is a good example of the line’s improvement. After not recording a single sack or tackle for loss last season, he has 2.5 TFLs and a sack in the first five games. McCoy, a redshirt freshman, had two sacks against Central Florida, giving the Buff Nation reason to be optimistic about the future.

Overall, that’s the production the Buffs have been needing from the players up front and a big reason why Colorado’s defense is much improved.

September Grade … B+

Linebackers 

Nikhai Hill-Green, like the linebacker corps as a whole, entered the season as a question mark. Yes, Hill-Green had been at Michigan, but he had only six starts in three seasons in Ann Arbor. Yes, he had started 11 games for Charlotte in 2023, and was the 49ers second-leading tackler … but that was Charlotte.

How would Hill-Green’s game translate to CU’s defense?

Through his play in September, Hill-Green has justified the CU coaches’ belief in signing him. A starter since Game Two, Hill-Green is second on the team in tackles with 32, including a team-leading five for loss. He also has a sack, a pass breakup and a quarterback hurry. He has been particularly stout against the run, and, now paired with fellow inside linebacker LaVonta Bentley, gives the Buffs a nice one-two punch in the middle.

Hill-Green has played so well that first game starter, Trevor Woods, has decided to red-shirt and preserve his final season. Another inside linebacker, Jeremiah Brown, has also decided to redshirt (though, notably, has not entered the Transfer Portal, remaining a Buff, at least for now).

The linebacker corps remain a question mark, and depth remains a concern, but the unit is not the liability the Buff Nation feared it would be a month ago.

September Grade … B

Defensive Backs

As with the wide receivers, the discussion of the CU defensive backfield has to begin with Travis Hunter. With teams decidedly avoiding Hunter (Baylor didn’t throw a single pass to a receiver covered by Hunter), his defensive stats are not otherworldly (15 tackles, three passes defended), but, when teams dare to come his way, Hunter has been a human highlight film, with two impressive interceptions and a game-winning forced fumble against Baylor.

With half of the field unavailable, opposing offenses have been concentrating on the other side of the field. As a result, cornerbacks DJ McKinney and Preston Hodge have been getting plenty of attention, and have been playing well.

Hodge has a pair of interceptions, including a first quarter interception against Central Florida which turned the momentum to CU’s favor. McKinney, meanwhile, has 31 tackles, including two for loss, and a team-best five pass breakups as the opposing team’s favorite target.

At safety, Cam’Ron Silmon-Craig has become a fan favorite. A starter in 10 games a year ago, Silmon-Craig was nevertheless overshadowed by fellow safety Shilo Sanders.

But when Sanders left the Nebraska game early with an injury, Silmon-Craig grabbed the spotlight and has been a force every week since. He leads the Buffs in tackles with 36, including 30 solo stops and three tackles for loss. He also has four quarterback hurries, a pass breakup and last week recorded a 95-yard fumble return for a touchdown in CU’s 48-21 win at UCF, tying the second-longest return in Colorado history.

“Cam’s the heartbeat. I love that dude,” defensive coordinator Robert Livingston said. “Cam is everything you want from a player. He wears his emotions on his sleeve. He speaks, people listen. He’s our unquestioned leader. We go as Cam goes, and he does a great job setting the tone, and he’s everything you want in a player and a person. So super glad we have him, and excited for the rest of the year for him.”

Sophomore Carter Stoutmire has been the starter in Shilo’s absence, and has acquitted himself well. With Sanders slated to return after the bye, the back end of CU’s defense will be even deeper and more talented.

September Grade … A-

Special Teams

The only “unit” which had returning starters from last season was in CU’s kicking game, with kicker Alejandro Mata and punter Mark Vassett returning.

Both have had their moments … and both have had their issues.

Vassett shanked a few punts early, but is seemingly righting the ship. His 43.7 yards per punt average ranks him 29th nationally, but CU opponents have been averaging 46.8 yards per punt in those same five games. Vassett to date has had five punts going for over 50 yards; CU’s opponents have had nine. Vassett has put eight punts inside opponents’ 20-yard line; opponent punters have had nine.

Alejandro Mata has made five-of-seven field goals, but also struggled. His early kicks were low, and one was blocked.

The return game was supposed to be a decided advantage for Colorado, with Jimmy Horn joined by All-American punt returner LaJohntay Wester. But … CU has had only three kickoff returns to date, and, other than a 27-yard punt return by Horn late in the second quarter against UCF, setting up a field goal, the return game has been quiet.

Meanwhile, CU has allowed ten kickoff returns for 245 yards, including a kickoff return for a touchdown against Baylor, and seven punt returns for 126 yards.

Oh, and don’t get Buff fans started on kickoffs not going for touchbacks … and that was before Jace Feely was injured and lost for the season.

September Grade … C

Overall 

Here are the numbers through CU’s first five games of the 2024 season:

  • Rushing defense … 156.0 ypg. 85th in the nation (2023 – 176.4 ypg. 107th)
  • Passing defense … 223.6 ypg., 84th in the nation (2023 – 276.9 ypg., 124th)
  • Total defense … 379.6 ypg., 88th in the nation (2023 – 453.3 ypg., 127th)
  • Scoring defense …  23.0 ppg., 64th in the nation (2023 – 34.8 ppg., 121st)

CU’s defensive numbers have not been great, but they are a significant step up from last season. Is a mediocre defense – at least in terms of stats – good enough for the Buffs to compete for a Big 12 title? Probably not.

But is a mediocre to good defense, one which is improving game over game, good enough to get Colorado to a bowl game and a winning season?

Definitely.

The CU defense is not dominant, but it is a definite improvement over what the Buff Nation has seen on the field for, well, years (probably not since 2016). The defense can keep the Buffs in games long enough for the CU offense to score points.

The next two months will be fun to watch, as the Buffs will be competitive in every game they play.

When was the last time we could say that?

September Overall Grade … B.

Previously postedSeptember Grades – Offense

—–

4 Replies to “September Grades – Defense & Special Teams”

  1. I think Marcus had 2 great points:
    1. Our stats do not contain any cupcakes. I saw somewhere that they recalculated strength of schedule and we are at like 29th now. No great teams, but definitely no real bad teams (CSU may trend that way….)
    2. The turn over margin is the most important stat in the game. We dominate. That alone is a letter grade.

    So I think our stats do not get the benefit of padding, and I think our defense is playing in a defensive scheme with a lot of new players. I would love to think our defense is going to play like we did against UCF the rest of the season. That might be an optimistic, or we might still not have seen our ceiling yet…….

    Take out the pick 6, the return for a td, and the defense is averaging 20.2 points per game……

    The run defense is stifling, we appear to have fitted the qb runs in pretty well now. We are figuring out we cannot stay in man constantly (and it got us an interception last week). This defense could be special.

    1. Thanks Rob.

      ” That might be an optimistic, or we might still not have seen our ceiling yet…….”

      If they are still learning to play together, have good coaching, the DC seems awesome by the way, so great coaching and they have Shilo coming back, we should expect them to get better and UCF may not be their ceiling, but the beginning. We’ll see if that happens, but we’re hearing how the players love Livingson and the staff and they’re just playing better, and… faster, and… they are really loving it too.

      It just seems that Prime has what he needs to keep this team moving forward… Including the intangibles that only a few like him can bring to the table.

      We’ll see Saturday when a ranked KSU, who’s predicted to win comes to Boulder, if UCF was the Buffs “starting to come together”, THEN I Expect (Stuart’s essay) them to win again on Saturday, and… turning the spread around again too. Maybe not by as much as UCF’s 40 point switch, KSU knows what they’re getting into now; but a win against a ranked conference foe is what I’m expecting and at starts with an opportunist defense and an offense that rewards them for those opportunities.

      I’ll leave you with how improved Jackson State was in their second year… And do you know/remembered what Prime had when he got there? I think we’re seeing the same here at CU, it’s just hard to believe after 2 decades of the desert; minus 2016.

  2. part of the poor D stats is the poor stats of the run game. The Buffs passing game leaves too much time for the opposing offense on the field.
    on another note
    I watched the CSU loss off on and on. It was a snoozer until the 4th qtr. Bazillions of penalty’s poor time management by both teams. Hankerson, Tank and Wells got to beat CSU again. If Norvel hasnt seen a cardiologist yet he better. The CSU D has a lot of trash talkers. Even after Hankerson peels off a 9 yard run with a lot of it YAC their D backs would chirp away while Hank just rolls his eyes.

  3. Good write up Stuart. Since the Buffs didn’t get to load up on stats by playing cupcakes; their stats aren’t going to help them out here compared to some teams, like UCF who loaded their stats against two cupcakes. CU’s first game was going to be a battle with a giant killer coming to town playing with more belief that they could win than many G5 teams who are not at the top of their conference.

    Then there was Neb, who had a beef to settle at home in a very hostile crowd, and the second half of the game went far better than the first, if played today could the Buffs keep the first half closer today?

    So let’s look at the last three games improvement and see were CU would stand in the stats with two conference wins; which is twice as many conference wins as last year in only two games.

    CSU:
    Points scored 28; Points against 9
    Yards gained 419; Yards against 340
    TO recovered 4, against 1
    First downs 23, against 17

    Baylor:
    Points scored 38; Points against 31
    Yards gained 432; Yards against 314
    TO recovered 1, against 0
    First downs 24, against 15

    UCF:
    Points scored 48; Points against 21
    Yards gained 418; Yards against 468
    TO recovered 4, against 1
    First downs 26, against 24

    Averages:
    Points scored 38; Points against 20.33
    Yards gained 423; Yards against 374
    TO recovered 3, against 0.67
    First downs 24.33, against 18.67

    Going into conference play with the above stats against an in-state rival who was talking shit about how they were going to win and two conference foes paints a different picture. And, UCF was a two touch down favorite at home, playing in the after mass of a hurricane in 104 degree heat with insane humidity!

    If the improvement continues all of the conference games are winnable… All of the conference games are winnable if the Buffs continue to improve and play complete games like they did against UCF. Texas Tech is the only conference foe that the Buffs will be facing who are still undefeated in conference play with only one loss to WSU, so maybe? But Tech’s record at home is really good compared to on the road.

    Stuart, you have given the defense an overall grade of B, and I have to believe you’re grade is taking into consideration the Buffs improvement to date and conference play; those stats are really close to the overall total in yards gained v. yards given in all games to date… BUT the TO margin for those three games are: 4.5 to 1 (3.0 to 0.67) AND the points for are: 38 v. 20.33 and those two stats paint a picture of a very opportunist defense and an offense that rewards those opportunities given.

    WOW! KEEP IT UP BUFFS!

    Do those two stats change your grade? How do the TO and Points for v. against in those three games effect your grade?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *