Polls Archive

• Washington. Sarkisian accumulating talent, ready to break through. (50%, 104 Votes)
• Utah. Easy schedule; 18 returning starters. (20%, 41 Votes)
• Cal or Arizona State. Eventually, they have to be good, right? (19%, 40 Votes)
• No other team from the Pac-12 will be ranked in 2012 (11%, 25 Votes)

Start Date: January 10, 2012 @ 5:09 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• One or two - More to come in years to come, but not this year. (64%, 143 Votes)
• Zero - Ten losses in 2011; six straight losing seasons. CU's reality. (32%, 72 Votes)
• Three or more - CU "flipped" eight players last year. It ain't over 'till it's over! (4%, 8 Votes)

Start Date: January 9, 2012 @ 9:03 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• "If we can just get them to Boulder" ... At least CU has a shot, right? (81%, 224 Votes)
• A commitment is a commitment. There is no benefit to paying for a recruit who has no interest in CU (12%, 34 Votes)
• Let them have their fun. A few weekends being treated like royalty? What's wrong with that? (7%, 19 Votes)

Start Date: January 8, 2012 @ 11:19 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Never gonna happen; money will never materialize. CSU didn't pony up for Lubick; won't happen now. (37%, 82 Votes)
• It's a flight of fancy, but I give the Rams credit for pluck (33%, 73 Votes)
• A smart move to announce, even without the dollars in place. It builds momentum (CU should be taking notes) (30%, 69 Votes)

Start Date: January 6, 2012 @ 12:54 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• The chance at starting out 3-0 in non-conference play (49%, 109 Votes)
• Having six home games, with only five true road games (25%, 56 Votes)
• Having two games at home to finish - with bowl bids on the line (20%, 44 Votes)
• Spliting the bye week; extra time to prepare for Arizona State (6%, 14 Votes)

Start Date: January 5, 2012 @ 9:21 am
End Date: No Expiry