Polls Archive

• Which will pay dividends in 2013. Trial by fire last year will result in better play this fall (51%, 118 Votes)
• We'll see ... But it can't hurt to have that much tape to study! (37%, 86 Votes)
• ... And posted a total of two (two!) interceptions. Experience doesn't necessarily equate to improvement (12%, 29 Votes)

Start Date: August 4, 2013 @ 8:26 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Somewhat of a concern. Starters have talent; bringing in Gillam and Reid this January will help depth (53%, 98 Votes)
• A huge concern. If one or more starters is lost to injury, CU's defense could be as bad as last season's (29%, 53 Votes)
• Not a concern. CU will be playing with nickel (and dime) DB's most of the season, lessening the need for linebacker depth (18%, 33 Votes)

Start Date: August 3, 2013 @ 7:26 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• A bad idea. This would mean any malcontent or poor performer would be untouchable for four years (56%, 81 Votes)
• A good idea. Players are expected to honor their commitment to the school. Why shouldn't the schools be equally bound? (44%, 64 Votes)

Start Date: August 2, 2013 @ 8:05 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Good news. Mac & Co. continue to think outside the box, which is what it's going to take (70%, 172 Votes)
• Hard to say, but I'm not that thrilled on giving up a scholarship CU could have used next February (27%, 66 Votes)
• Not so great news. Your telling me that CU couldn't find a decent kicker out of the Class of 2014? (3%, 7 Votes)

Start Date: August 1, 2013 @ 8:14 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• An unknown. There will be improvement, but it will it be enough for CU to be consistently competitive? (71%, 156 Votes)
• A strength. Uzo-Diribe can be All-Pac-12; plenty of depth and experience (20%, 43 Votes)
• A weakness. Simple math: Same players ... and the Buffs were 115th in rushing defense last fall (9%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: July 31, 2013 @ 8:32 pm
End Date: No Expiry