Polls Archive

• Don't know ... I'm hopeful, but even if it doesn't happen in April, it will probably happen in the near future (53%, 79 Votes)
• Yes. The $50 M goal will be met. The Spring Game will be a great opportunity to build enthusiasm for the project (25%, 37 Votes)
• No. If it was going to happen, we would have had confirmation by now (22%, 34 Votes)

Start Date: March 29, 2014 @ 7:57 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Players should not be allowed to unionize. It will change the landscape of college athletics - and not for the better (58%, 125 Votes)
• Unsure. There are still too many unanswered questions (27%, 59 Votes)
• Players should be allowed to unionize. It's the next logical step (15%, 33 Votes)

Start Date: March 28, 2014 @ 9:19 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Much ado about nothing. This is just the first salvo in a battle which will rage on for years (38%, 78 Votes)
• I'm not sure about the long term consequences, but it was certainly a surprise ruling (32%, 66 Votes)
• This is big news. The landscape of college athletics as we know it is on its way to dramatic changes (30%, 60 Votes)

Start Date: March 26, 2014 @ 7:06 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• About the same. It's been a fairly bland spring so far - not sure if that's good or bad (63%, 145 Votes)
• More optimistic. Reports are positive; sounds like Year Two will be a significant leap forward (30%, 69 Votes)
• Less optimistic. The defensive line is a patchwork; no clear leader at running back or wide receiver identified (7%, 15 Votes)

Start Date: March 25, 2014 @ 7:10 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Good for CU. More prestige for the conference; more $$$ for the CU athletic department (76%, 166 Votes)
• Don't really care. After CU left the tournament, my interests moved back to spring football (17%, 38 Votes)
• Not so good for CU. Better recruiting for rivals; will make it that much harder for CU to climb up the Pac-12 standings (7%, 15 Votes)

Start Date: March 24, 2014 @ 4:01 pm
End Date: No Expiry