Polls Archive

• Every position for me is a "position of intrigue" this spring. We've been without CU football for three months, and the Buffs are back practicing next week. I'm excited for all of it! (50%, 75 Votes)
• No. For starters, who will take over the lead as QB1, and how the offensive line shapes up, are far more interesting than which of the many talented wide receivers play better this spring (36%, 54 Votes)
• Yes. CU's top four wide receivers, including Travis Hunter, and gone. There is a mix of returning talent, transfers, and freshmen. How the room sorts itself will be a main topic of conversation (14%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: March 5, 2025 @ 5:43 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• My interest is solely focused on my Buffs, and I see this settlement as an opportunity for CU to solidify itself as a national player over the next years. I hope CU can maintain nationally relevant (59%, 69 Votes)
• Yes. By reducing the payouts to leave, the ACC has laid the groundwork for FSU, Clemson, North Carolina and Miami to seek better deals. It may not happen until 2030, but it will happen (23%, 27 Votes)
• Not necessarily. By giving the big dogs a bigger slice of the pie (which the Pac-12 wasn't willing to give USC), the smaller ACC programs bought themselves some time to keep the conference together (18%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: March 4, 2025 @ 5:50 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Sorry, but no. I hope that CU can get the extra $200,000, but I'm not going to be a part of the campaign (44%, 35 Votes)
• We'll see. Just like a telethon or an auction, this will likely come down to the last minute. If CU is at 199 donors late on Thursday ... I may be the donor which helps CU cash the $200,000 check! (30%, 24 Votes)
• Yes! Count me in. You can donate to any sport you would like, and, if CU can get to 200 donors by Thursday, an anonymous donor will kick in $200,000. Let's make it happen! (26%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: March 3, 2025 @ 5:33 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Finding a rushing attack. CU can't last in the nation in rushing in 2025 and have hopes of repeating a nine-win season. Be it the line, the backs, or the calls, the running game has to emerge (85%, 154 Votes)
• Play-calling. "Hero ball" with Shedeur and four NFL-worthy wide receivers was fun in 2025, but it isn't going to work in 2025. Pick a QB, and build your offense around him (10%, 18 Votes)
• Leading a coaching staff with very little experience. Marshall Faulk and Andre Gurode were splashy hires, but they bring precious little coaching experience to the table (5%, 10 Votes)

Start Date: March 2, 2025 @ 5:56 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• I'm just glad to have CU players be part of the conversation. How many times has CU had one (or none) at the Combine. Now, CU is one of the teams getting the most attention. I love it! (61%, 91 Votes)
• Not really. There is so much time between now and the April draft, and a player's "wingspan" isn't something I feel I need to pay much attention to in March (31%, 47 Votes)
• Yes! Shedeur and Travis are making headlines without participating, and CU's wide receiver prospects are showing out, raising their draft stock (8%, 12 Votes)

Start Date: March 1, 2025 @ 5:20 pm
End Date: No Expiry